Examining the link between aging and interest rates.
For a long time, we’ve been waiting. Since the 2008 financial crisis, we've been hoping. But the reality is that for the last 40 years interest rates in Canada and the United States have been declining. At the same time, the population has been growing older and birth rates have dropped.
Boomers, borrowers and savers
It’s no secret that we’re getting older. The median age in Canada is now 40.8 years, up from 30 in 1982.[1] Canada’s population is moving closer to a population of savers (50–70) rather than borrowers (18–49). It's generally accepted that young people have a borrowing mindset, requiring capital to purchase homes and cars. On the opposite end of the spectrum are people middle-aged and older, who have more of a saver mentality. After decades in the workforce, considerable assets have been acquired, debt is usually low and saving for retirement tends to become a priority.As populations grow older, extra effort may be required to encourage consumers to take on additional debt. Economies with aging populations need to create what's called a borrower’s market. In a typical borrower’s market, lower interest rates must be offered in order to encourage people to borrow rather than save.
But we are not just feeling the effects of an aging population – decreasing birth rates are also a big factor. During the postwar baby boom (1941–1964), the number of annual births exceeded 2 per 100 women in the United States. As this cohort matured and went to school, got married and bought houses and cars, this pushed up interest rates in what was very much a lender’s market. The massive borrowing of the boomer generation pushed interest rates up to almost 16 per cent in the early ’80s. Today, the birth rate globally is an anemic 1.08 per cent, not nearly robust enough to fuel inflation and interest rates to the levels of the boomer years.
Financial crisis or not, interest rates have been on the decline since the mid-’80s. So, what does an aging population mean for Canada and the United States? It may help to look at countries that already have a higher median age.
Japan and Germany
The median age in Japan is 48.4 years, and the median age in Germany is 45.9.[2] Both these countries have negative-yielding interest rates.[3] In these countries, population growth slowed and then eventually stopped. This meant that the older cohorts represented the largest population growth. As these cohorts started to age, they became net savers. The younger, smaller cohorts behind them didn’t generate enough borrowing demand to offset the glut of savings in the country.
We begin to see a link between a higher saver-to-borrower ratio and a lower rate of interest in a given country. The table below shows the saver-to-borrower ratios and 10-year bond rates.
SAVER/BORROWER RATIOS |
||
---|---|---|
|
Saver/ borrower Ratio |
10-year bond rate |
South Africa |
0.173238 |
7.06 |
Indonesia |
0.195122 |
7.27 |
United States |
0.384956 |
1.85 |
Canada |
0.443058 |
1.42 |
Germany |
0.524288 |
0.46 |
Japan | 0.578014 |
0.27 |
Slower, lower, longer
“My belief is that the change in the population growth rate and the change in the average age drives inflation and interest rates” – Philip Petursson, Chief Investment Strategist, Manulife Investments
The world’s population growth rate peaked in 1968 at 2.1 per cent and has been in decline ever since. “When we overlay the spike in 1968 [population growth] with the spike in interest rates a little over 10 years later, the two align quite nicely,” says Petursson. This means that interest rates peaked as the impact of that population growth rate moved through the economy.
Petursson explains, “You had this massive demographic shift … in their prime earning and prime spending years driving inflation, driving interest rates. Well, guess what? As that moves through the economy, you start to see declines in the population growth rate. You get what we have today, which is low inflation and low interest rates.”
Without that demographic thrust to push interest rates higher, we could be in a prolonged period of lower interest rates. “In terms of asset allocation, fixed income may not provide the returns we’ve been used to over the last 30 or 40 years,” says Petursson. “Our portfolios aren’t going to look the same with regards to allocations as they did 20 or 30 years ago.”
Young bucks
Granted, the world is getting older, but different countries experience expansions and contractions at different times. So what about those countries that aren’t as old? Emerging market countries may be well behind the developed markets in terms of not just development but, more importantly, maturity. Some are experiencing rapid growth. In Brazil, for example, the median age is only 31.[4] Brazil’s 10-year government bond yield is 6.8 per cent,[5] compared to the United States at 1.85 per cent and Canada at 1.42 per cent. India and Indonesia have attractive 10-year sovereign bond rates as well.
What about a managed solution?
While it may seem like a great idea to add some diversification to your portfolio with higher-yielding debt, it may be a challenge to actually purchase those securities. The average investor may find that they would have neither the capital nor the time to identify and acquire suitable higher-yielding securities.
Manulife’s strategic fixed income portfolio management team spends a lot of time analyzing sovereign debt from all over the world. The Manulife Strategic Income Fund, managed by Dan Janis and Tom Goggins, employs an active approach to fixed income investing. Janis and Goggins weigh yield against solvency to create a portfolio designed for a low interest rate environment.
For more information visit: https://retail.manulifeinvestmentmgmt.com/ca/en/investments/mutual/MMF159E
[2] www.worldometers.info/world-population/japan-population; www.statista.com/statistics/624303/average-age-of-the-population-in-germany
[4] www.statista.com/statistics/254361/average-age-of-the-population-in-brazil
[5] www.worldgovernmentbonds.com/country/brazil Accessed feb 19th 2020
Copyright Manulife
FOR ADVISOR USE ONLY.
© 2020 Manulife. As one of Canada’s largest integrated financial services providers, Manulife offers a variety of products and services including insurance, living benefits, segregated fund contracts, mutual funds, annuities and guaranteed interest contracts. The persons and situations depicted are fictional and their resemblance to anyone living or dead is purely coincidental. This media is for information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific financial, tax, legal, accounting or other advice and should not be relied upon in that regard. Many of the issues discussed will vary by province. Individuals should seek the advice of professionals to ensure that any action taken with respect to this information is appropriate to their specific situation. E & O E. Manulife Mutual Funds and Manulife Exchange‑Traded Funds (ETFs) are managed by Manulife Investment Management (formerly named Manulife Asset Management Limited). Manulife Investment Management is a trade name of Manulife Investment Management Limited. A division of Manulife Asset Management Limited. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in the Manulife Mutual Funds and Manulife ETFs. Please read the ETF facts/fund facts as well as the prospectus before investing. The Manulife Mutual Funds and Manulife ETFs are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Any amount that is allocated to a segregated fund is invested at the risk of the contractholder and may increase or decrease in value. Manulife, Manulife & Stylized M Design, and Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.